Author Article by Peter McPhee: Was this a tragic case of the dangers of ideological and personal rigidity, as powerful literary dramatizations taught me? Or was it rather an extreme example of how great leaders may be vilified by those they have served and saved? Or was it something quite different?
Would you like to merge this question into it? MERGE already exists as an alternate of this question. Would you like to make it the primary and merge this question into it? MERGE exists and is an alternate of. He went too far with his revolutionary ideas. He killed thousands of people, sending them to the guillotine, just because they still believed in the monarchial system Maximilien Robespierre wanted to get rid of so desperately.
He killed everybody that thought differently than him. He was the creator of the reign of terror and was eventually sent to the guillotine himself in after the French turned against him when their eyes opened and say what he had done.
He killed thousands of people, sending them to the guillotine, just because they still believed in the monarchial system Maximilien Robespierre wanted to get rid of so desperately. Was Robespierre a hero or a villain? Robespierre was a villain. He was a person that believed strongly in the everyone being equal and believed that people that were against everyone being equal had to die.
At the same time he created the reign of terror sending thousands of men, woman en children and even the King and Queen of France! He killed everyone that thought differently than him. He send everybody that did not agree with his ideas and were still devoted to the monarchs to the guillotine he sent thousands to the guillotine, including Louis XVI and Marie Antoinette.
He went too far in acting out his ideas. Eventually the French turned against him and send him to the guillotine himself, without a trial.
He became the only one that was guillotined face up, so he could see the blade fall at him. When that happened, he screamed, and the blade cut right through his jaws, resulting in his lower jaw being stuck to his neck and the upper to the beheaded head The above story of his execution is a myth.
Robespierre was executed but 1 he did have a trial, though it did not follow the due process of the law, because nobody wanted to hear Robespierre defend his violent actions. Robespierre shattered his jaw, and died with the lower half of his face in a bandage, unable to scream. Another Answer Robespierre was originally thought to be incorruptible.
Unfortunately he went mad with power. I think that before then, he was a good man, but when he took power and headed the reign of terror he pun intended "lost his head". Another answer This is a question of judgment.
Robespierre was neither a villain nor a hero. Even if he was considered and still is as a villain when the people succeeded in getting rid of him. But to give a judgment is an hard exercise when History is concerned.
He strongly believed in equity and was quite intransigent on this point no freedom for the enemies of freedom, he said. Except the judgment aspect, the answer above is correct, or, at least is the reflection of what the french think about this historical character. He offered free education for all and the opportunity for the third estate.
The actions that come about because of his desire to seek change are clearly unfortunate.
The creation of the deity and the reign of terror are out of touch with the free speech he initially proposed. The question is, why should Louis XVI and the 1st and 2nd estate be thought of in a positive light when it was their selfishness that led to the likes of Robespierre.
In essence, Robespierre can be looked at as any leader who brings change. Good can come but what is the price? He is clearly a better man than anyone leader of the 1st or 2nd estates.
Robespierre went too far. It was the ancient regime, the absolute power that the revolutionaries wanted to rid themselves off, not the lives of their monarchs!Maximilien de Robespierre, a Unconventional Hero.
Words | 9 Pages Maximilien De Robespierre was a very complex revolutionary political leader who greatly influenced the French Revolution. — Maximilien Robespierre, Though nominally all members of the committee were equal, Robespierre was later presented during the Thermidorian Reaction by the surviving protagonists of the Terror, especially Bertrand Barère, as prominent.
Peter McPhee is a professorial fellow at the University of Melbourne, where he was the university’s first provost. He has published widely on the history of modern France, including most recently Living the French Revolution, Maximilien De Robespierre was a very complex revolutionary political leader who greatly influenced the French Revolution.
Although he was a left-wing bourgeoisie inspired by Enlightenment principles and philosophers such as Jean-Jacques Rousseau and Montesquieu, many considered his . Robespierre enemy or hero? Essay Robespierre essay At the expense of thousands of lives, the recent terror that has struck France has helped to rescue France from the brink of total collapse.
Robespierre: Hero or Tyrant? Robespierre played a very significant role during the French Revolution. What he did and his political power made many look up to him.